Dear Tony, Jon AS, List,
I sent a note (copy below) to
Peirce-L, in which I recommended some
of your work for ongoing
discussions of phaneroscopy. But Jon
objected to my saying that your
subject matter is phaneroscopy:
JAS> Jappy's paper further
clarifies that phenomenology/phaneroscopy
provid
John, List:
I have corrected the subject line since the cited writings by Jappy and
quoted statements by Peirce are not about phaneroscopy at all, but about
speculative grammar as the first branch of the normative science of logic
as semeiotic. Jappy himself recognizes this in the very first chapt
Cf: Differential Logic and Dynamic Systems • Discussion 6
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/06/14/differential-logic-and-dynamic-systems-discussion-6/
Re: Differential Logic and Dynamic Systems • Discussions
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/05/26/differential-logic-and-dynamic-systems-discuss
Cathy, I’m impressed with your awareness of phaneroscopy as an activity, a
practice which informs our way of “continuing on with the business of life.” As
slide 3 observes, this aspect of it seems to escape notice because of its
association with Peirce’s theory of categories. Part of the problem
Gary R., Cathy T., all,
Gary R. wrote:
I should note, however, that I did find Merleau-Ponty's mid-20th
century inquiries, initiated in his *Phenomenology of Perception*,
of considerable interest (as I believe does Ben Udell, the
co-manager with me of Peirce-L and the Arisbe website)
Speaker: Andrzej Indrzejczak, presenting his book "Seqents and Trees"
Chair: Peter Schroeder-Heister, Member of the Editorial Board of Studies in
Universal Logic
Associate Organization: Polish Association for Logic and Philosophy of
Science, presented by Marcin Miłkowski
Registrate here to attend
