List, Edwina:
First, Edwina, I will not answer directly your question about allowances on
this list.
In my experiences here on this list, I fear for my freedom to continue to
express my analysis of the ontology and epistemology of the chemical sciences.
As for the connections between the
> John, List:
>
> You write:
>>
In any case, this is just one of many cases where it's essential to
>> distinguish (a) mathematics as the infinite totality of all
patterns
>> and teories about them, (b) the people who discover
mathematical
>> theories, and (c) the application of
mathematics
John, List:
You write:
> In any case, this is just one of many cases where it's essential to
> distinguish (a) mathematics as the infinite totality of all patterns
> and teories about them, (b) the people who discover mathematical
> theories, and (c) the application of mathematics in other
Jerry and Edwina,
I found three quotations by Peirce that
directly contradict the three sentences in ADT's slide 25, (Copies below
my signature)
In the first sentence of that slide, ADT belittles
Peirce's life's work: "we cannot
count on mathematicians to help
figure out what goes on in
Jerry, list
I like your outline of the nine terms and the graphic connections.
I'm not a chemist and your outline is 'packed' with meaning, but, I
agree with your conclusion, that " to 'transition out of
mathematics’ infers, from the perception chemical signs,
transitioning out
In English :
Where do you get this position of power on this list that allows you to
choose very biased ADT slides, to supposedly put them up for debate, to set
yourself up as a vigilante when participants argue disagreements and to
pass judgement on them? Edwina has long experienced this and I
Le lun. 16 août 2021 à 17:10, a écrit :
> Bernard, thanks for this clarification; it shows that my comment about the
> “dynamic object” of the term “phaneroscopy” was completely wrong. Indeed
> you’ve shown that the concept of a “dynamic object” plays no part in your
> philosophy of language.
>
Gary F,
Soyez persuadé que je ne cesserai pas de lut
Le lun. 16 août 2021 à 17:10, a écrit :
> Bernard, thanks for this clarification; it shows that my comment about the
> “dynamic object” of the term “phaneroscopy” was completely wrong. Indeed
> you’ve shown that the concept of a “dynamic
Jon, List
The classification of a sign is due to the three relations S-S, S-O, S-I. Is this another kind of projective reducibility, in which XxX, XxY, XxZ also determines the triadic relation XxYxZ, and determination in this case is classification?
Best,
Helmut
16. August 2021 um
Bernard, thanks for this clarification; it shows that my comment about the
“dynamic object” of the term “phaneroscopy” was completely wrong. Indeed you’ve
shown that the concept of a “dynamic object” plays no part in your philosophy
of language.
BM: To my sense, be it a technical or standard
Cf: ⚠ It’s A Trap ⚠
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2013/05/18/%e2%9a%a0-its-a-trap-%e2%9a%a0/
Re: Kenneth W. Regan • Graduate Student Traps
https://rjlipton.wpcomstaging.com/2013/05/15/graduate-student-traps
So it begins ...
The most common mathematical trap I run across has to do with
Triadic
Dear Colleague,
You are invited to join the second session of The Logic and Religion
Webinar Series, organized by the Logic and Religion Association (LARA),
which will be held on August 19 at 4pm CEST with the topic:
*ARE WE BODIES OR SOULS?*
Speaker: Richard Swinburne (University of Oxford,
Gary F., list
Le 15/08/2021 à 14:35, g...@gnusystems.ca a écrit :
Bernard, I wish I could converse about this aspect of language in
French, but unfortunately I don’t have that ability.
BM: But I am wholly astonished by the rigorus property you are
attaching to definitions or descriptions
13 matches
Mail list logo
