Jon, Robert, John, List,
As I have in the past, I encourage anyone who wants to explore in detail
and in depth all of Peirce's versions of a classification of the sciences
to study the sole monograph on these various versions, Charles S. Peirce:
Logic and the Classification of the Sciences by
JAS, list
I continue to disagree with your interpretations of Peirce- with regard to the
triadic sign, the hylomorphic monism of matter-mind, and cosmology and the
emergence of the universe. I’ve provided enough supportive quotations
previously to support my interpretations and won’t repeat
Edwina, List:
As I have already explained twice before in this thread, no one can ever
be absolutely certain that a particular understanding of Peirce's writings (
*dynamical* interpretant) matches their final interpretant--the
*correct *reading,
how the texts *necessarily would be* understood
Robert, John, List:
The *word *"phenomenology" appears in these early attempts by Peirce at
classifying the sciences, but here it *does not* designate what he later
defines as the study of whatever is or could be present to the mind in any
way. This is explicit in the first one (R 1345:4-6),
John, Bernard, List,
There is Another Classification of the Sciences from MS 1345 with an
explanation by Peirce on his agreement with Auguste Comte:
=
MS1345_037
*Art*.2 In the
John, List,
I couldn't help but notice that quite recently you've changed from "nobody
can claim that anything other than an exact quotation is what Peirce
intended" (which is reasonable enough) to "Nobody has a clue about what
Peirce meant" (which seems doubtful at best) to today's "Nobody on
FYI
Dear all,
I’m copying here the CFP for our upcoming Gatherings in Biosemiotics.
Please feel free to pass it along!
22nd Annual Gatherings in Biosemiotics – Call for Papers
June 27th – July 1st, 2022
Palacký University, Olomouc, Czechia
Celebrating 22 years of existence, the
A short description of the MS pages that will be digitized:
"But Peirce's mature work is only available in his papers at Houghton Library.
These, estimated at some 50,000 manuscript pages, remain unpublished, and are
in brittle condition. While some of these documents are available on a
Robert, John, List
Thanks Robert for retrieving this text that presents some interesting
properties for the recent discussions on the list.
I don't remember having read it before and I don't consider to have
myself worked thoroughly the topic of CSP science classifications.
Yet it seems to
