Helmut, List:
HR: But why are there more than three interpretants?
There are *not *more than three interpretants, just multiple ways of naming
them in different contexts. The relevant debates among Peirce scholars have
to do with whether "the divisions of interpretant into immediate, dynamic,
John, List,
I vaguely remember, that at some point in the last weeks, somebody quoted somebody, who said, that the theory is more complicated than the reality it is for. I think, it (the theory) is a fractal. A fractal looks very complicated, but it has a very simple generator formula (like
[image: image.png]
New OUP Prize for Teaching with Technology AnnouncedMonday, January 29, 2024
The American Philosophical Association and Oxford University Press are
pleased to announce the establishment of a new prize recognizing
outstanding use of technology in the teaching of philosophy and
John, list
Regardless of the terminology, which I acknowledge obscures the analysis, I
think that one can conclude that Peirce’s view is that there are three
Interpretants. One is Individual Internal; the next is Individual External,
and the last one is Collective External. And- each of
