Re: [PEIRCE-L] Interpretants, Sign Classification, and 3ns (was Who, What, When, Where, How, and Why)

2024-02-16 Thread Jon Alan Schmidt
John, List: JFS: We were talking about a method that a student or scholar of Peirce may use for testing a sign to determine whether it is an instance of 1ns, 2ns, or 3ns. Again, according to Peirce, there are *ten different respects* by which a sign can be classified as an instance of

[PEIRCE-L] Mathematical Proof of Peirce's Reduction Thesis; and Valental Graphs

2024-02-16 Thread Gary Richmond
Jon, List, You recently wrote: JAS: I do not know whether anyone has posted a mathematical proof of Peirce's reduction thesis on the Internet. Robert Burch wrote an entire book to present his [. . .] while Sergiy Koshkin purports to demonstrate it even more rigorously in a recent paper. I

[PEIRCE-L] Commens

2024-02-16 Thread Gary Richmond
List, A couple of List members have noted that *Commens *is back up and running. http://www.commens.org We have Ben Udell to thank for noodling within the site when it went down, then alerting Mats Bergman -- who manages and, along with Sami Paavola and João Queiroz, developed that very useful

Aw: [PEIRCE-L] Interpretants, Sign Classification, and 3ns (was Who, What, When, Where, How, and Why)

2024-02-16 Thread Helmut Raulien
Jon, John, List,   The answer "A brooch" looks like a rheme, but as an answer it is a proposition, as "he gives her" is just omitted for the reason, that both know this opening. A triadic proposition, I think, if not already is an argument, at least involves a "because". For example if you say;