List,
I haven´t thoroughly followed the discussion about "mark", because I felt, that in this case the academic meaning (possibly a possible) differs too much from from the common meaning, in which a mark is an actual material sign, intended to be recognizable by anybody else.
Now I want
John, List
I think this concept of the ‘right’ to use different terminologies when
discussing reality aligns with Peirce’s concept of the advancement of
knowledge, where he specifically rejects the Cartesian ‘epistemic
individualism’, ie, making the individual the ‘locus of knowledge’ [ with
