On Oct 6, 2014, at 5:45 PM, Gary Richmond gary.richm...@gmail.com wrote:
And, further, for Peirce these two are joined not, as they've traditionally
been, by a copula, but rather by an index of a peculiar kind, indeed of a
metaphysical kind, namely, an index pointing to the real fact
Clark, Ben, Gary F, lists,
Clark wrote:
With a dicisign because it is more expansive than mere language, a
traditional copula is insufficient. Thus a painting can be a dicisign but
clearly it doesn't have a copula in any normal syntactical sense. (There's
no to be of the painting) Yet there is a
