Re: [PEIRCE-L] Concluding section 7 of the article on phaneroscopy

2024-01-29 Thread Edwina Taborsky
refore his claim, that there "scienttific"ly is a necessity in history. >> History is just stories. I wonder, whether Popper knew Peirce, because I see >> some parallelity. >> >> Best, Helmut >> >> Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Januar 2024 um 21:33 Uhr >

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Concluding section 7 of the article on phaneroscopy

2024-01-29 Thread Edwina Taborsky
knew Peirce, because I see > some parallelity. > > Best, Helmut > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Januar 2024 um 21:33 Uhr > Von: "Edwina Taborsky" > An: s...@bestweb.net > Cc: "Peirce List" , "CG" > > Betreff: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Concluding section 7 o

Aw: [PEIRCE-L] Concluding section 7 of the article on phaneroscopy

2024-01-29 Thread Helmut Raulien
parallelity.   Best, Helmut   Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Januar 2024 um 21:33 Uhr Von: "Edwina Taborsky" An: s...@bestweb.net Cc: "Peirce List" , "CG" Betreff: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Concluding section 7 of the article on phaneroscopy John, list   Thanks for the chapter.

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Concluding section 7 of the article on phaneroscopy

2024-01-28 Thread Edwina Taborsky
John, list Thanks for the chapter. I particularly liked your inclusion off the Peircean quote; Get rid, thoughtful Reader, of the Okhamistic prejudice of political partisanship that in thought, in being, and in development the indefinite is due to a degeneration from a primal state of perfect