BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}JAS, list
I wasn't outlining Peirce's EGs [existential graphs] - so there is
no need to rush into their defense and point out what you consider my
errors. I wasn't dealing with the EGs! I was answering Jack's
Jack, Edwina, List:
ET: Put the dot right at the intersection of the three lines of the Y.
In Peirce's EGs, there is no "dot" at the intersection, there is the name
of a triadic relation. In his generic examples (CP 1.347, 1903), this is
simply a letter--"a," "b," "c," or "d." In semiosis, it
