ce-l, and rightly so, in my opinion. I see no cause for complaint that any of these different kinds of posts exist on peirce-l.
I hope that clarifies things a little.
Gary f.
From: Helmut Raulien
Sent: 31-Jul-18 14:13
To: g...@gnusystems.ca
Cc: 'Peirce-L'
Subject: Aw: RE: [PEIRCE-L] RE: peer
k nine or ten times. That should save me a lot of writing time too!
> Anyway, I’ll stop now — sorry if I caused the list any grief.
>
> Gary f.
>
> *From:* Gary Richmond
> *Sent:* 31-Jul-18 15:10
> *To:* Peirce-L
> *Subject:* Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: peerages
>
>
>
> Gary
unhelpful to my peers, so instead
> of thinking twice before writing a post (as a generally do), maybe I should
> think nine or ten times. That should save me a lot of writing time too!
> Anyway, I’ll stop now — sorry if I caused the list any grief.
>
> Gary f.
>
> *From:*
maybe I should think nine or ten times. That should
save me a lot of writing time too! Anyway, I’ll stop now — sorry if I caused
the list any grief.
Gary f.
From: Gary Richmond
Sent: 31-Jul-18 15:10
To: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: peerages
Gary f, list,
While I would cer
o I believe, that
> *everybody* should be doing that. There are plenty of subjects other than
> Peirce’s system that are being inquired into on peirce-l, and rightly so,
> in my opinion. I see no cause for complaint that any of these different
> kinds of posts exist on peirce-l.
>
>
, in my opinion. I see no cause for complaint that any of these
different kinds of posts exist on peirce-l.
I hope that clarifies things a little.
Gary f.
From: Helmut Raulien
Sent: 31-Jul-18 14:13
To: g...@gnusystems.ca
Cc: 'Peirce-L'
Subject: Aw: RE: [PEIRCE-L] RE: peerages
Gary f, list
Gary f, list,
While I would certainly hope that all the subscribers to the Peirce-L forum
know that they are peers here, I'm not at all certain that all do feel that
way--are always being made to feel that way; and it seems to me unlikely
that a comment like the following will help
F Sowa
Sent: 31-Jul-18 14:29
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: peerages
On 7/31/2018 12:37 PM, g...@gnusystems.ca wrote:
> I do think it’s become clear that there is more than one community
> /within/ this community.
Peirce had such a broad range of interests that I
Amen.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 31, 2018, at 15:28, John F Sowa wrote:
>
>> On 7/31/2018 12:37 PM, g...@gnusystems.ca wrote:
>> I do think it’s become clear that there is more than one community /within/
>> this community.
>
> Peirce had such a broad range of interests that I don't
On 7/31/2018 12:37 PM, g...@gnusystems.ca wrote:
I do think it’s become clear that there is more than one community
/within/ this community.
Peirce had such a broad range of interests that I don't believe
that anybody could correctly classify them.
I know that people who have tried to
surmises about what I meant.
Gary f.
From: Edwina Taborsky
Sent: 31-Jul-18 13:20
To: 'Peirce-L' ; g...@gnusystems.ca
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: peerages
Gary F, list
I agree that there are multiple communities focused on the work of Peirce. However, I disagree with your evaluation
To: 'Peirce-L'
; g...@gnusystems.ca
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: peerages
Gary F, list
I agree that there are multiple communities focused on the work of
Peirce. However, I disagree with your evaluation of the 'value' of
each community.
That is, if I understand you, Gary F,
...@gnusystems.ca
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: peerages
Gary F, list
I agree that there are multiple communities focused on the work of Peirce.
However, I disagree with your evaluation of the 'value' of each community.
That is, if I understand you, Gary F, correctly, you seem to consider that only
Gary F, list
I agree that there are multiple communities focused on the work of
Peirce. However, I disagree with your evaluation of the 'value' of
each community.
That is, if I understand you, Gary F, correctly, you seem to
consider that only the community engaged in
Gary R, list,
I don’t think there’s any question that the subscribers to this list are a
community of peers. But I do think it’s become clear that there is more than
one community within this community.
There is one community engaged in inquiry about Peirce’s work, his system, if
we may use
15 matches
Mail list logo
