Jerry, You wrote to me:
JLRC:"My purpose is mainly to align the logics in terms of Tarski’s
meta-languages, but I will not address that here."
KiM: If and when Tarski is your object of thought, my note is completely
irrelevant.
JLRC: The meta-languages of interest here geometry, matter, num
Jon, John, Kirsti, List:
First, Ok, I found the passages. My source was Roberts, Existential Graphs of
CSP, p.26. Roberts cites 3.469 and 4.561.
Now to the philosophical issues and the perplexity of number theory as matter.
This post should be contrasted with FS views of the role of diagrams
