List,
It behooves us to stop accusing people of being literalists as if it is
*their* problem that they are literalists.
Today, there is a wind blowing through the Academy demanding that all of us
become literalists when we encounter digital models of the human mind,
creating an unhealthy
Claudio - I am equal to anyone else, and therefore, am as 'equipped'
[whatever does that mean?] to handle further exploration of Peirce's
work in the 21st century. What I expect from the List is that when I
post something that does such exploration, I would be met with: 'Yes,
that's an
List,
Of course, we are post-Peirceans! How could we be pre-Peirceans or even
just Peirceans...!!!
this pretentious behavior, the gratuitous aggression and the silence of
others is the reason way I left writing to the List some years ago
"Some *'literalists' *think we should leave the forest as
Dear Margaretha,
Your conception of attitude is in interpersonal relations, very
psychological. But it is not about that... it is about epistemology ...
Here is for example a very vertical "*epistemological attitude*" of Peirce :
*""Every systematic philosopher must provide himself a
List,
I think, a problem is, that sometimes people want to talk about and analyse a theme, while others always immediately are looking for hermeneutical reference. Both is valuable, but, on one hand, a theme cannot be properly discussed, if it always is disturbed by accusations of wrong
Hi Edwina,
I respect your decision to not interact with people with ZOOM or SKYPE.
But what about the phone then? Hopefully, you will consider joining us via
the phone if this ZOOM/SKYPE gathering were ever to happen.
Talking about Popper's *Open Society and Its Enemies*, the real enemy is
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}I'm fine with and would love a real coffee house chat - but I'm not
into Skype or Zoom. Won't even do it with my kids.
I think that Robert Marty's post is correct - where he agreed with
Gary F - that a separate
What about taking this conversation off list, as in literally off list?
For example, to a Skype or ZOOM session that we treat as a
drink/juice-in-a-bar happening where no one is allowed to talk about
serious stuff for the first half hour? Something like an international
Peirce Meet 'n Greet?
Or
Exactly!! That's the spirit!
And it shows, clearly, how different subject matters are treated on
this list.
Edwina
On Sat 16/10/21 12:23 PM , g...@gnusystems.ca sent:
I think it could be helpful for the group that has been complaining
about the subject matter
I think it could be helpful for the group that has been complaining about the
subject matter of postings on this list to create a new one that would be more
to their liking. At least we (subscribers to peirce-l) wouldn’t have to read
all those complaints any more.
Gary f.
} Truth is
Dear Margaretha, John, Edwina, list,
I concur about the absurdity of beginning a separate list and very much
appreciate the manner in which you have put it.
As for Popper and Peirce, warnings are everywhere.
Proceeding with good judgment about them is harder to find.
With best wishes,
Jerry
List,
I think it is absurd to start a separate mailing list.
Especially since its purpose would be to use Peirce's work as a mirror to
see what is going on in society today.
If people feel perturbed or unvalidated after reading the emails
distributed by this list, well, have you ever had a
List,
On Thursday, I sent the note below to Peirce-L. I received some strong
positive comments and suggestions offline, but complete silence from the
people who send most of the notes to Peirce-L.For example: "As for the
natural extensions of Peirce's thought, even when they agree
13 matches
Mail list logo
