t,
> because it also is impossible to imagine this pseudo-thought, you cannot
> picture it?
>
> Best
> Helmut
>
> > Gesendet: Samstag, den 06.08.2022 um 16:10 Uhr
> > Von: "Thomas Gollier"
> > An: Peirce-L
> > Cc: c...@lists.iccs-conference.org
> &
ot picture it?
Best
Helmut
> Gesendet: Samstag, den 06.08.2022 um 16:10 Uhr
> Von: "Thomas Gollier"
> An: Peirce-L
> Cc: c...@lists.iccs-conference.org
> Betreff: Re: [PEIRCE-L] reality, thought and language / names for mixed zones
>
> John,
>
> I've been
John,
I've been waiting for someone to take up Jean-Yves' challenge. I can go
along with your categorizations, but only if "reality" refers to the
reality of Secondness, or more specifically to the dynamic object.
Otherwise — if for instance "reality" refers, or also refers, to
the reality of Thi
My suggested labels for the intersections:
Reality and thought: Perception and action.
Reality and language: Semantics
Thought and language: Imagination
All three: Semeiotic
John
From: "jean-yves beziau" beziau...@gmail.com
We can build a Venn diagram with three circles:
reality, thought and language.
It it not clear what names can be given to the mixed zones:
https://sites.google.com/view/reality-thought-language/mixed-zones
Does anyone have some answers?
Best Wishes
Jean-Yves
>---
We can build a Venn diagram with three circles:
reality, thought and language.
It it not clear what names can be given to the mixed zones:
https://sites.google.com/view/reality-thought-language/mixed-zones
Does anyone have some answers?
Best Wishes
Jean-Yves
>---
