Helmut, list
1] I'm not sure what a 'universally valid law' means. After all,
'laws' in themselves, are evolved habits, both in the natural world
and in the conceptual world. Therefore, a conceptual belief, whether
operative in a sect, religion, or myth, is as much a 'law' or
Supplement: With "law" I was meaning "universally valid law", not a law stated by a sect, religion, or myth. These would not concern the difference between the NOT- operator and the EXIST- operator, as both are universal, none of them is particularistic. Particularistic "laws" I would not
Edwina,
I find it interesting, that you think, that the semiosic process begins with 1ns, I originally think so too. That is, because in my opinion, the object does not exist before it is denoted. The sign/representamen makes something (a subject?) an object. I only wrote "2-1-3" to not raise a
