Re: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Inference as growth

2021-02-02 Thread Edwina Taborsky
Helmut, list To say that 'A exists' - can be translated, I think, into a syllogistic sentence of, for example: All men are biological organisms. [with 'biological organism' understood as 'existing'. So, that's a universal, ie, a law. But, to declare that 'No

Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Inference as growth

2021-02-02 Thread Helmut Raulien
  Edwina, List,   with "universally valid law " I meant the universe as domain, especially for the example, that "A exists" has the property of a law, 3ns, but "A doesn´t exist" does not have this property, is merely 2ns.   About the object you are right, and I was wrong. The dynamic object

Re: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Inference as growth (was No subject

2021-02-01 Thread Auke van Breemen
> Op 1 februari 2021 om 17:03 schreef Helmut Raulien : > > Auke, Jon, John, Edwina, All, > > I don´t see, that a transparent universe is the critical point: Jon A.S.´ > example is valid in a transparent universe too: > Helmut, The point is not if Jon's example is valid in a tra

Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Inference as growth (was No subject

2021-02-01 Thread Helmut Raulien
Auke, Jon, John, Edwina, All,   I don´t see, that a transparent universe is the critical point: Jon A.S.´ example is valid in a transparent universe too: From "There is no unicorn that is not pink" , which is true, does not follow "Every unicorn is pink", which is not true, even or especially not