Edwina, List:
Again, I do not expect to convince you; I am only doing exactly what you
have said in the past that I should do, which is to note our disagreement
and then make the case for my own view.
Where do you see me "equating the Representamen with the Interpretant"?
Regards,
Jon S.
On
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }
Jon - stop. You haven't convinced me. I repeat; when I saw the
written word - that word was a Dynamic Object. It then 'moved' into
my Mind as an IO, where my knowledge base [Representamen] came up
with several
Edwina, List:
JAS: Initially the bare word "vase" stood for my previous discussion with
Gary R. to your interpreting mind.
ET: The first time - my Interpretant of it was that it referred to your
discussion with Gary R.
I read these two statements as saying exactly the same thing--the word
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Jon - NO. NO.
It may have been a Representamen according to YOUR analysis. But it
was, right from the start, to me - a Dynamic Object.
The first time - my Interpretant of it was that it referred to
