subject:"Semiotics and Identity, CP 6.339 Was Re\: \[PEIRCE\-L\] Categories and Modes of Being \(was How should semeiotic be classified among the sciences\?\)"

Re: Semiotics and Identity, CP 6.339 Was Re: [PEIRCE-L] Categories and Modes of Being (was How should semeiotic be classified among the sciences?)

2018-09-12 Thread Jon Alan Schmidt

Jerry C., List: JLRC: Why do you associate this excerpt with Icons, Indices and Symbols? Because we know from the preceding paragraph that "each kind of sign" refers specifically to Icon/Index/Symbol. CSP: All thinking is dialogic in form. Your self of one instant appeals to your deeper self

Semiotics and Identity, CP 6.339 Was Re: [PEIRCE-L] Categories and Modes of Being (was How should semeiotic be classified among the sciences?)

2018-09-12 Thread Jerry LR Chandler

List, Jon, Francesco: > On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:14 PM, Jon Alan Schmidt > wrote: > > He also wrote later that the three different forms of thought--corresponding > to Icons, Indices, and Symbols--are best explained by positing three > different "modes of metaphysical being." > > CSP: You will