Re: Units of the Universe (was) Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Universe as a Self-Organizing Musical Instrument (USOMI)

2015-11-14 Thread Jerry LR Chandler
t thinking > about it (very much) is a waste of time and effort. > > John Collier > Professor Emeritus, UKZN > http://web.ncf.ca/collier > > From: Jerry LR Chandler [mailto:jerry_lr_chand...@me.com] > Sent: November 14, 2015 8:00 PM > To: PEIRCE-L > Cc: Sungchul J

RE: Units of the Universe (was) Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Universe as a Self-Organizing Musical Instrument (USOMI)

2015-11-14 Thread John Collier
_lr_chand...@me.com] Sent: November 14, 2015 8:00 PM To: PEIRCE-L Cc: Sungchul Ji; John Collier Subject: Units of the Universe (was) Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Universe as a Self-Organizing Musical Instrument (USOMI) List, John, Sung: Gentle responses inserted. :-) On Nov 14, 2015, at 4:49 AM, John Col

Units of the Universe (was) Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Universe as a Self-Organizing Musical Instrument (USOMI)

2015-11-14 Thread Jerry LR Chandler
List, John, Sung: Gentle responses inserted. :-) On Nov 14, 2015, at 4:49 AM, John Collier wrote: > Jerry, > > Isn’t this just a straightforward consequence of Fourier analysis? Of course, yes. My first sentence is merely a factual statement. > Are you implying that Fourier analysis has