List, John, Sung:
Gentle responses inserted. :-)
On Nov 14, 2015, at 4:49 AM, John Collier wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> Isn’t this just a straightforward consequence of Fourier analysis?
Of course, yes. My first sentence is merely a factual statement.
> Are you implying that Fourier analysis
Jerry,
It is fairly obvious that we disagree about ontological commitment. When I talk
of "its" I am talking about existents, not merely realities. Likewise, when I
talk of "bits", which I take to be grounded in existent distinctions. So I
don't know what it would mean to in addition to
List, John:
On Nov 14, 2015, at 12:54 PM, John Collier wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> It is fairly obvious that we disagree about ontological commitment.
Yes.
JLRC
> When I talk of “its” I am talking about existents, not merely realities.
> Likewise, when I talk of “bits”, which I take to be
