Hi,
i have not read the text by Peirce, but wonder, what social might have to do with logic, because many, if not most social structures are collusions (common illusions), such as myths, that are rather made up to create an impression of logic, where there is none, in order to cope with
Helmut,
I would recommend that you read Peirce on this, beginning perhaps with the
two papers mentioned in my post yesterday, then moving on to his papers
after 1900 on pragmatism. In a word, Peirce argues this point best.
Best,
Gary
*Gary Richmond*
*Philosophy and Critical Thinking*
Helmut, list
Peirce's argument is that induction and hypothetical inference depend
for their general rationale or justification on their correctability in
the course of research, and the idea of that correctability depends on
the idea of a community indefinite in size, with the prospect of
Ben, Helmut, list,
Ben, a very nice, succinct summary!
Best,
Gary
*Gary Richmond*
*Philosophy and Critical Thinking*
*Communication Studies*
*LaGuardia College of the City University of New York*
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Benjamin Udell bud...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Helmut, list
Also it will be more and more the case that minds will arrive at similar or
complementary conclusions, rendering claims of individuals to originality
less and less credible. I wonder at what point this will alter the way in
which we process common awareness. The wiki phenomenon is an obvious
How fixed is the scientific argument for this law? Certainly in this
century there have been some who have chipped away at the idea of entropy
as a fixed star in an otherwise fallible (subject to revision) scientific
universe. And I am unaware of where Peirce stood on this matter. Were his
notions
I am not sure what you are saying. Non-idolatry in my view is the supreme
value of all and underlies all other good values. This means it can modify,
condition, adjust, trump or accentuate one's consideration. If you mean
that is the strong conclusion. The premise as I read it is that time has
Stephen, Gary, List,
These would be the passages that always come most readily to my mind in this
connection:
Definition Of Logic
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/06/01/c-s-peirce-%E2%80%A2-on-the-definition-of-logic/
Logic As Semiotic
Yes, thank you, Ben! I am a bit culture-pessimistic because of the news. Correcting errors in a worldwide close-to-ideal communication community is a good idea. I think, I sympathize with Apel (ultimate explanation of discourse ethics) and Habermas. There should be a semiotics of fallacy-signs, I
Thank you!
Gary C. Moore
On Friday, June 27, 2014 1:54 PM, Jon Awbrey jawb...@att.net wrote:
Stephen, Gary, List,
These would be the passages that always come most readily to my mind in this
connection:
Definition Of Logic
Excellent!
Gary C. Moore
On Friday, June 27, 2014 2:00 PM, Helmut Raulien h.raul...@gmx.de wrote:
Yes, thank you, Ben! I am a bit culture-pessimistic because of the news.
Correcting errors in a worldwide close-to-ideal communication community is a
good idea. I think, I sympathize with
This may add to the discussion:
47. But it may be asked whether if there were an element of real chance in
the universe it must not occasionally be productive of signal effects such
as could not pass unobserved. In answer to this question, without stopping
to point out that there is an abundance
12 matches
Mail list logo