Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: Re: Natural Propositions

Gary F, Jeff, lists, I agree that Jeff's quotes are well worth reflecting on in connection with NP. While I know them rather well, I must admit that I hadn't seen, or at least didn't remember, the quotation you provided, hidden, as it were, in a note at the back of EP2. As you remarked, the

[PEIRCE-L] Peirce in 1913 on existential graphs

List, While we're waiting for the Natural Propositions seminar to recommence, I thought I'd send this on an oddity that I've found. I think I've mentioned at peirce-l in the past that I couldn't track down a certain correction that Peirce made to a graph in Prolegomena - I don't mean

[PEIRCE-L] Peirce’s 1880 “Algebra Of Logic” Chapter 3 • Selection 4

Post : Peirce's 1880 “Algebra Of Logic” Chapter 3 • Selection 4 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/12/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%e2%80%a2-selection-4/ Posted : February 12, 2015 at 4:00 pm blockquote Chapter 3. The Logic of Relatives (cont.) §2. Relatives (cont.) 220.

Aw: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Six Ways of Looking at a Triadic Relation ⌬ 1

Jon, List, I was thinking of comparing the sentence C thanks A for B with a square root: The square root of a positive number has either a positive or a negative result (or is it both?). And, that C is thankful is also only one possibility of result: C might also not like B and reject it, or

RE: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's 1880 “Algebra Of Logic” Chapter 3 • Selection 3

Thanks Jon. I put integers to each of the nine dual relatives in the first three columns and rows. (in Bold print) I then rotated the block left 90 degrees three times. Crease the diagonals 357 753, tack down the 4 corners , and pull the apex straight up into a pyramid. Voila!

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce’s 1880 “Algebra Of Logic” Chapter 3 • Selection 4

Inquiry Blog http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/01/30/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-preliminaries/ http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/01/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-selection-1/

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce’s 1880 “Algebra Of Logic” Chapter 3 • Selection 4

List, Jon: If read from a technical perspective, this passage (CP 3.220) can be interpreted as nearly self-contradictory or utterly ambiguous. It appears that CSP is unable to distinguish between nouns as Proper Nouns and nouns as generals. But this can be a perplex gloss. Contrast: Every

Re: Aw: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Six Ways of Looking at a Triadic Relation ⌬ 1

Helmut, List, Descriptive semiotics is always available for describing whatever manner of free associations and personal connotations might chance to pass through a given interpreter's head or external expressions, but logic conceived as normative semiotics is an inquiry oriented toward more