Dear Franklin, lists -
It is classically described as such in the literature. The formal structure af
abduction (the proposition A explains the occurrence B as a matter of
necessity, therefore A can be chosen as a hypothesis to explain B) does not
explain why A should be chosen over infinitely
Frederik, lists,
That is a general explanation attempt of why humans are capable of
abduction - that does not say anything about particular cases such as
Wegener's.
Hmm. I'm not sure what you could be looking for here. In general, any
semiotic being capable of abduction must have a natural
Koichiro,
'. . . The path-dependent history carried by those incumbent elements in
the reaction cycle, once stabilized through the successive alternation of
the incumbents, must be functional in keeping the cycle in a durable
manner.
Is your reaction cycle described above different from what
