Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [biosemiotics:8892] Re: The problem with

2015-09-19 Thread Edwina Taborsky
Helmut - I wasn't referring to Sung's triad (phaneron-body-mind) for I don't agree with it, or with almost all of his outlines. My comment to you was merely to remind you that the Peircean triad (not the same as Sung's triad) of Object-Representamen-Interpretant can have each of these

[PEIRCE-L] posts invoking Peirce on www.languagelore.net

2015-09-19 Thread Michael Shapiro
List,Gary Richmond has suggested that in future I cross-post whatever appears on my blog, www.languagelore.net, that invokes Peircean ideas, and I plan to follow Gary's suggestion. However, for those who wish to read what already exists in this vein can simply enter the word "Peirce" in the search

[PEIRCE-L] Aw: [biosemiotics:8892] Re: The problem with

2015-09-19 Thread Helmut Raulien
Dear Sung, lists, I like your diagram:                                                         f                              g                               Phaneron  -> Body  -->    Mind                               (Firstness)            (Secondness)            

[PEIRCE-L] The First Law of Quantitative Semiotics: Information = Changes in Shannon Entropy, or I = dH

2015-09-19 Thread Sungchul Ji
Hi, (*1*) I think semiotics can be divided into two branches --the *qualitative* and *quantitative *semiotics, i.e., the study of *qualitative signs (*e.g., words) and *quantitative signs *(e.g., numbers), respectively. Examples of the former would include classical philosophy, linguistics,