Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce and Practopoiesis: now I understand it better

Hi Jerry, Did you mean that First, Second and Third are adjectives and Firstness, Secondness and Thirdness are nouns ? All the best. Sung On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Jerry LR Chandler wrote: > > > Begin forwarded message: > > *From: *Jerry LR Chandler

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce and Practopoiesis: now I understand it better

Sung: I meant what I wrote: > My conjecture is that CSP is intentionally invented these terms to infer a > special class of objects that intrinsically communicate, grammatically, terms > that implicitly contain the qualities of both being a noun and an adjective. > Thus each of the three

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce and Practopoiesis: now I understand it better

Sung: Please write more carefully. Please do not attribute your sentences to me. You are free to interpret CSP's words however you wish. You are free to interpret any passage of CSP with any other passage of CSP however you wish. You are free to consider any passage of CSP as good sense or

[PEIRCE-L] Zalamea lecture series free in NYC in October

Lists, Jeffrey Brian Downard tells us, and suggests that we announce to peirce-l and the biosemiotics list, that *Fernando Zalamea* is giving a series of lectures in NYC starting next week, and is applying ideas from Peirce's mathematical work to logic in questions in contemporary culture

[PEIRCE-L] Forgetfulness Of Purpose • 2

Forgetfulness Of Purpose • 2 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/09/29/forgetfulness-of-purpose-%e2%80%a2-2/ Peircers, I had planned to get down to brass tacks as quickly as possible, with an object example from Ashby's Cybernetics ( http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/books/IntroCyb.pdf ) that made an