Ben, list:
You said:
*it's pretty hopeless to confine one's attention to such things. Part of
Arnold's point seems to be that we can't so confine our attention, since
social institutions themselves already are social inquiry processes.*
Nietzsche said:
*Essential to begin with the body and
Gary, list,
what I am confused about, is, that on one hand Shepperson says, that statistics are not helpful, but on the other hand he sticks with the term "...numerable". Might it not be better, to first inquire about the nature of humans, how humans have reacted in certain situations in
Gary R., Jon S., John C., list,
Consideration of potential populations (abnumerable collections)
involving "would-be's" might inform sociology, anthropology, etc., by
focusing attention on aspects of their subject matter that are real yet
difficult to draw inductive conclusions about. I've
