Re: CSP and Spinoza (was Re: [PEIRCE-L] Metaphysics and Nothing (was Peirce's Cosmology))

Jerry C, list: I’d like to point out another interesting observation. Peirce says, “he identifies God and Nature, but does not mean by Nature what is ordinarily meant.” What he means by *ordinarily meant by Nature* is purposively vague. Would you say the meaning is decided? Best,

CSP and Spinoza (was Re: [PEIRCE-L] Metaphysics and Nothing (was Peirce's Cosmology))

List: > On Oct 30, 2016, at 12:30 AM, Jerry Rhee wrote: > > Spinoza’s chief work, the “Ethics”, is an exposition of the idea of the > absolute, with a monistic theory of the correspondence between mind and > matter, and applications to the philosophy of living. It is an