[PEIRCE-L] On esoteric and exoteric Peirce

2016-11-12 Thread Jerry Rhee
Dear list, How are we to interpret Peirce based strictly on the printed word if the philosopher says such things as: “My book is meant for people who *want to find out; *and people who want philosophy ladled out to them can go elsewhere.” I mean, it’s not as though Peirce didn’t

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Metaphysics and Nothing (was Peirce's Cosmology)

2016-11-12 Thread John F Sowa
On 11/12/2016 12:55 PM, kirst...@saunalahti.fi wrote: You wrote: "Different languages have different options for the grammatical forms that express such relations. The number of options could lead to a combinatorial explosion, but the practical number is limited by human memory." I take your

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Time, Topology, Differential Logic

2016-11-12 Thread Jon Awbrey
John, List, No, purple numbers are not my thing. These are just excerpts on basic topics from standard texts that I posted to various discussion groups way back when. I saved them wholesale as pre-formatted blocks of text and I've been segmenting them back into individual notes whenever I