[PEIRCE-L] sign, system, structure

Dear list members,   I have started writing my blog (is it a blog?)  about systems theory, based on Peirce´s categories and signs theory. Please criticize it. Usually (as default) I will not mention people´s names, except by quoting from something already published. But please write: "mention

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's classification of the sciences

Fantastic, John. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 25, 2017, at 15:17, John F Sowa wrote: > > I drew the attached CSPsciences.jpg to illustrate Peirce's > "Outline Classification of the Sciences", CP 1.180-202 > or EP 2.258-262 (1903). > > The dotted lines show dependencies: the

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's classification of the sciences

This makes perfect sense in relation to Peirce but I do not think it fulfills what Peirce might have conceded is a more useful and pragmaticist effort to create the world in which triadic thinking would not be an academic cul de sac but rather a theater of understanding based on his musings and

[PEIRCE-L] Peirce's classification of the sciences

I drew the attached CSPsciences.jpg to illustrate Peirce's "Outline Classification of the Sciences", CP 1.180-202 or EP 2.258-262 (1903). The dotted lines show dependencies: the category at the lower end of each line depends on the one at the higher end. Only two sciences have no dependencies

Re: CP2.230 (1910) ] Systems of Meaning was Re: [PEIRCE-L] 123, abc

Stefan B, Stephen CR, Bev, and Kirsti, I drew a new diagram based on Peirce's classification of the sciences. I'll send it to the list in a separate thread. Stephan I believe you are seeing this from a very different viewpoint. I am interested in the sociology and history of knowledge. So