Mike, That little chat is sufficiently vague and untestable by any experiment anybody is likely to carry through that it's indistinguishable from the mind flapping through the physical breeze. The many sentences and phrases in it
Your opening line starts "We spoke before..." How much speaking did you do in order to get ChatGPT to spin off that theory? The many sentences and phrases in it could have been copied from various articles about the Big Bang. John ---------------------------------------- From: "Mike Bergman" <m...@mkbergman.com> Sent: 5/13/23 8:18 PM To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu, ontolog-fo...@googlegroups.com Subject: [ontolog-forum] Just for Grins Hi All A little chat is appended below. Best, Mike ============= Santiago: We spoke earlier about CS Peirce and his logical operation of prescission. Given the list above, can you speculate on an order of prescission (or emergence)? ChatGPT: Indeed, Charles Sanders Peirce's philosophical concept of prescission, which involves the separation of concepts in the mind without asserting they can exist independently in reality, could be applicable to the list of emergent phenomena in the early universe. One could imagine an order of prescission (or emergence) that parallels the chronological development of the universe, but it's important to note that this is a speculative exercise and that the nature of these phenomena and their interactions are still subjects of ongoing research. Here's a possible ordering: Emergence of Classical Spacetime: This would be the first step, corresponding to the inflationary period shortly after the Big Bang, where quantum fluctuations get stretched to macroscopic scales, leading to the emergence of classical spacetime from the quantum realm. Emergence of Fundamental Forces: As the universe cools down from its initial high-energy state, the fundamental forces begin to separate from the primordial unified force in a series of symmetry-breaking transitions. This leads to the emergence of the strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces, with gravity possibly remaining unified at these energy scales. Emergence of Matter: The universe continues to cool and expand, leading to the emergence of matter particles from the quark-gluon plasma. This corresponds to the era of baryogenesis and includes the formation of protons, neutrons, and eventually atoms. Emergence of Cosmic Structures: Finally, as the universe continues to evolve, the small density perturbations present from the inflationary period grow under gravity to form the large-scale structures we see today, including galaxies, clusters, and superclusters. Again, this is a very simplified view. Each of these stages involves complex processes and interactions that we're still striving to understand. And in the spirit of prescission, while we can conceptually separate these stages, they are deeply interconnected in the actual history of the universe. Santiago: Makes quite a bit of sense, does it not? ChatGPT: Yes, it certainly does. It's a fascinating way to think about the early universe and the process of emergence, especially when you consider it in the context of Peirce's concept of prescission. It highlights the interconnectedness of these different stages, and how our current universe emerged from a series of complex, intertwined processes. This conceptual framework could potentially provide new insights into our understanding of the universe's history and evolution. It underscores the fact that while we can make intellectual distinctions between different stages and phenomena, the reality is a deeply interconnected system where one stage flows into the next, and each level of emergence is built upon the one before it. But as with all models and theories, it's important to continue testing these ideas against observations and experiments, and to be open to refining or even discarding them in light of new evidence. That's the essence of scientific inquiry. Santiago: OK, please test another thought. We have an understanding of reality today. Why can we not "work backwards" (so to speak) looking back in time using prescission (and other knowledge and logic tests, of course) to trace what "thing" possibly emerged from a prior set of "things" in order to test what is precedent and therefore possibly more fundamental, working it all the way back to the universal categories of Firstness, Secondness and Thirdness? ChatGPT: The approach you suggest is quite intriguing and resonates with some of the fundamental principles of retrodiction in scientific inquiry. Retrodiction involves using current knowledge and observations to make informed conclusions about past states or events, and is a key aspect of many scientific disciplines, including cosmology, evolutionary biology, and geology. In the context of understanding the history and evolution of the universe, the idea of "working backwards" using principles like prescission, combined with empirical observations and logical reasoning, could potentially provide valuable insights. This would involve analyzing the emergent properties and phenomena of the universe as we observe it today, and then trying to trace back their origins and development through time. This process could indeed be guided by an understanding of Peirce's universal categories of Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness. In this context, these categories could be interpreted as representing fundamental aspects of reality: Firstness could represent the intrinsic qualities or potentials of the universe in its earliest, most fundamental state. Secondness could represent the actualization of these potentials through specific events or processes, such as the Big Bang, the inflationary epoch, or the formation of particles. Thirdness could represent the laws, regularities, and patterns that govern these processes and their outcomes, such as the laws of physics or the principles of thermodynamics. By attempting to trace the evolution of the universe back through these categories, we might gain a deeper understanding of the nature of reality and the processes that have shaped the universe we observe today. However, it's important to note that this approach would face significant challenges. Many aspects of the early universe are still poorly understood, and our current theories and observations only provide a limited window into these early epochs. Furthermore, the process of emergence is often non-linear and involves complex interactions that can be difficult to disentangle or reverse engineer. Nevertheless, the idea of "working backwards" in this way, guided by principles like prescission and the universal categories, is an intriguing one that could potentially offer valuable insights and guide future research in cosmology and fundamental physics.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
