dt
; JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Aw: meaning
Jon, List
Apologies in advance for this overly-long reply which may open up some lines of
thought without properly addressing them - in a bit of a rush but wanted to put
my point to paper! (it really is longwinded!
e even from the theoretical level as we theorize from the
subjective condition, and so such attempts are tautological to my mind.
________
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY
Sent: Friday, July 1, 2022 3:37 PM
To: Peirce-L ; Jon Alan Sc
of Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 7:53 PM
To: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Aw: meaning
Jack, List:
When Peirce associates feeling with 1ns, he is not referring to that which is
felt by a subject, which is clearly an example of 2ns. He is instead referring
; impossibility.
> --
> *From:* peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu
> on behalf of JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 30, 2022 3:48 PM
> *To:* s...@bestweb.net ; Helmut Raulien <
> h.raul...@gmx.de>
> *Cc:* Peirce List ; CG <
> c...@lists.iccs-conference.org>
to square the abstract circle).
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 4:32 PM
To: g...@gnusystems.ca ; Helmut Raulien
Cc: 'Peirce List'
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Aw: meaning
Helmut,
Yes I agree.
Helmut,
Yes I agree. Although he does give himself typically clever wiggle-room insofar
as he mentions potentiality which would seem to both include and exclude the
subject depending on one's level of analysis.
best
jack
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu
, 2022 3:48 PM
To: s...@bestweb.net ; Helmut Raulien
Cc: Peirce List ; CG
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Aw: meaning
A feeling is what it is, positively, regardless of anything else. Its being is
in it alone, and it is a mere potentiality. A brute force, as, for example, an
existent particle
A feeling is what it is, positively, regardless of anything else. Its being is
in it alone, and it is a mere potentiality. A brute force, as, for example, an
existent particle, on the other hand, is nothing for itself; whatever it is, it
is for what it is attracting and what it is repelling:
