Jon, Helmut,
I tend to concur with some of your analysis, Jon. Certainly it is essential
to remember that in the 1903 classification of signs that the three
trichotomies are, or perhaps more accurately, *represent* *relations*. But
it's equally important to remember that they are not, shall we
ily transfer thermodynamics to semiotics.
Best Regards
Helmut
Gesendet: Montag, 03. Juli 2023 um 01:03 Uhr
Von: "Jon Alan Schmidt"
An: "Peirce-L"
Betreff: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Categories for states and processes
Helmut, List:
One correction--in Peirce's 1903 taxon
Helmut, List:
One correction--in Peirce's 1903 taxonomy, the three trichotomies are *not *for
the sign, the object, and the interpretant. They are for the sign itself
(qualisign/sinsign/legisign), the *relation *of the sign to its object
(icon/index/symbol), and the *relation *of the sign to its
or usually located in Peircean philosophy and science.
---Frances
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu On
Behalf Of Helmut Raulien
Sent: Friday, 30 June, 2023 15:22
To: Peirce-L
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Categories for states and processes
List,
in physics, especially thermodynamics, we have state
List,
in physics, especially thermodynamics, we have state variables, e.g. temperature, and process variables, e.g. heat. I think, that this distinction is transferable to semiotics and the category theory. For example, if we look at the sign table, we have in the horizontal dimension the
