Dear discussion participants, lists -
Thanks to all participants and thread leaders in the long discussions about my
book – and especially thanks to Gary for organizing and keeping the the focus
over many months.
It has been highly instructive to encounter and speculate over the many
different
To all participants in the Natural Propositions seminar on the peirce-l and
biosemiotics lists,
It's about time to wrap up the seminar by thanking you all for taking part. I
think the cross-conversation between the two lists has helped to break some new
ground on both, and you have all
Thank you, Gary, for administering the seminar so reliably and well. I
would also like to thank Frederik for participating so richly in the
discussions, with such flair for clarifying differences and finding common
ground.
I'm going to go off the peirce-L list for a while now because I have some
Dear Jeff, lists
Thank you for good questions.
The gneralization that Jeff sums up in two points indeed forms my starting
point (and was considered in the Diagrammatology book of 2007).
Here, it is taken as the premiss to the vaster generalization that
logic/semiotics is independent of any
