Robert, List,
Thank you! And is that definition different from my Boolean assumption? Boole is about true/false, but "renders definitely to such as it will be", and "particular manner" sound like something between true or false, but is that so? "Not particular" and "not definitely" might be translated with "false", i think.
Best regards, Helmut
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 03. April 2024 um 18:06 Uhr
Von: "robert marty" <robert.mart...@gmail.com>
An: "Helmut Raulien" <h.raul...@gmx.de>, "Peirce-L" <PEIRCE-L@list.iupui.edu>
Betreff: Re: [PEIRCE-L] determination
Von: "robert marty" <robert.mart...@gmail.com>
An: "Helmut Raulien" <h.raul...@gmx.de>, "Peirce-L" <PEIRCE-L@list.iupui.edu>
Betreff: Re: [PEIRCE-L] determination
Helmut, list
According to Peirce, the definition if "renders definitely to be such as it will be"
"We thus learn that the Object determines (i.e. renders definitely to be such as it will be) the Sign in a particular manner.(CP 8.361)342-379 M-20b (1908))
Within the MS 611, p.67-68, Peirce verify that his definition of determination is transitive.
Best regards, Robert
Honorary Professor ; PhD Mathematics ; PhD Philosophy
| Sans virus.www.avast.com |
Le mer. 3 avr. 2024 à 16:36, Helmut Raulien <h.raul...@gmx.de> a écrit :
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Dear list members,some time later maybe I will work on my idea, that there are three kinds of systems hierarchy, besides the Salthean composition and subsumption also determination, so it is composition (1ns), determination (2ns) and classification (3ns). I call subsumption classification, because I find it more common. Do you think that is ok would be my first question, and the second is about the meaning of determination: I am just now thinking, that determination merely means: "A determines B" means "Not B without A", or "If B then A". Like, if there is a sign, then there is an/its object, or, if there is an interpretant, then there is a/its sign.Or, e.g., if there is a citizen, then there is a society, the society determines the citizen (the individual`s status as its citizen). If there is an individual within the range of a government, with the range defined by the government (composition), and so the individual defined as the government´s subservient (classification), then the government determines the individual, regardless of whether the individual classifies him/herself as its citizen or not, the determination is either ex- or inclusion (composition). This example shows, that composition, determination and classification form a complexity.Best regards, Helmut
ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY is now at
https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at
https://www.cspeirce.com . It'll take a while to repair / update all the links!
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY is now at https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at https://www.cspeirce.com . It'll take a while to repair / update all the links! ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
