Re: [peirce-l] Categorical Aspects of Abduction, Deduction, Induction

2012-03-04 Thread Jon Awbrey
Peircers, Gary brings us evidence that Peirce continued to find favor with his original opinion about the connections of the three categories with the principal types of signs and the principal types of inference, even when all the second guessing and third guessing had settled down, and yet

Re: [peirce-l] Categorical Aspects of Abduction, Deduction, Induction

2012-03-04 Thread Jon Awbrey
Peircers, Here are the excerpts I copied out and the notes I took on Peirce's treatment of information and inquiry in relation to the principal types of sign relations and the principal types of inference, all from his Lectures on the Logic of Science at Harvard (1865) and the Lowell Institute

Re: [peirce-l] A Question about Metaphysics and Logic

2012-03-04 Thread Benjamin Udell
Jason, Universal is an ambiguous word sometimes used to translate Aristotle's _katholos_ even when Aristotle means merely that which in everyday English is called general, something true of more than one object. Some philosophers say universals and particulars where Peirce (with his better

Re: [peirce-l] Categorical Aspects of Abduction, Deduction, Induction

2012-03-04 Thread Catherine Legg
Phyllis I also want to say how nice it is to have you back on the list! The research into the three types of problem-solving which you outline below is fascinating. Would you like to say a little more about how you derived these results - you seem to have experimented with live human subjects,

Re: [peirce-l] A Question about Metaphysics and Logic

2012-03-04 Thread Catherine Legg
Dear Jason, I've published a paper which distinguishes between 'universals' as discussed in contemporary Australian metaphysics (most particularly in the work of D.M. Armstrong), and 'generals' as discussed by Peirce. Here is the abstract: This paper contrasts the scholastic realists of David

[peirce-l] Proemial: On The Origin Of Experience

2012-03-04 Thread Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Dear List, I am writing the Proemial for my forthcoming book On The Origin Of Experience and will appreciate your feedback. In particular, I ask that you challenge two things about it. First, over the years of my work I have developed an aversion to using the term consciousness, which seems

Re: [peirce-l] Proemial: On The Origin Of Experience

2012-03-04 Thread malgosia askanas
I am sorry, but this inflated piece of vacuous hype would forever discourage me from having anything to do with the book. The only half-way informative tidbit is that the book concerns a logic informed by recent advances in biophysics. By the way, On Sense and Reference is not a book but a