Re: [peirce-l] “Some Leading Ideas of Peirce's Semiotic”

2011-10-04 Thread Houser, Nathan R.
It appears that my connectivity problems have been resolved and that I can now post directly to the forum. I’ll catch up with unanswered posts in batches tonight and tomorrow and then I’ll try to respond more quickly and on a one to one basis. Tonight I’ll comment on the 3 Oct posts from Gary Fu

Re: [peirce-l] “Some Leading Ideas of Peirce's Semiotic”

2011-10-04 Thread Jon Awbrey
Stephen, There is a curious resonance between several of the political themes that arose in our discussion of sciences as communicational communities and several of the philosophical (broadly formal, logical, or mathematical) themes that come up in Peirce's semiotics. It's an echo that has lurked

Re: [peirce-l] Some Leading Ideas of Peirce's Semiotic

2011-10-04 Thread Jon Awbrey
IA = Irving H. Anellis IA: From the quotation which follows J.R.'s claim that some 90 percent or more of Peirce’s work in philosophy is concerned with semiotics, i.e. CSP: "Know that from the day when at the age of 12 or 13 I took up, in my elder brother's room a copy of Whately's "Logi

Re: [peirce-l] “Some Leading Ideas of Peirce's Semiotic”

2011-10-04 Thread Jon Awbrey
NH = Nathan Houser JR = Joe Ransdell NH: Let me make a quick reply and later when I have more time I'll go back to Joe's paper to see if he may have had something like what you say in mind. I suppose a lot depends on precisely what Joe meant by "directly concerned with semiotic" when