Re: [peirce-l] “On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic”

2011-12-05 Thread Jon Awbrey
* Comments on the Peirce List slow reading of Joseph Ransdell, "On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic", http://www.cspeirce.com/menu/library/aboutcsp/ransdell/paradigm.htm Peircers, I would like to return to an earlier point in the discussion and continue with the thoughts t

Re: [peirce-l] “On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic”

2011-12-05 Thread Steven Ericsson-Zenith
A one word revision to my previous post: On Dec 4, 2011, at 4:18 AM, Jon Awbrey wrote: > ... > Keeping in mind the various dimensions of experience, I took some pains > to give an "even-handed" account of the tensions involved in integration: > >>> On the one hand I am much in favor of seeking d

Re: [peirce-l] “On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic”

2011-12-05 Thread Steven Ericsson-Zenith
On Dec 4, 2011, at 4:18 AM, Jon Awbrey wrote: > ... > Keeping in mind the various dimensions of experience, I took some pains > to give an "even-handed" account of the tensions involved in integration: > > >> On the one hand I am much in favor of seeking deeper-lying continuities ... > >> > >> On

Re: [peirce-l] "On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic"

2011-12-05 Thread Jon Awbrey
Yes, 1-Dimensional Man and 2 Cultures were part of the canon on the 60s. Later I would encounter Polanyi in Personal &Tacit Knowledge and Raymond Wilder on Mathematics as a Cultural System. Jon On Dec 4, 2011, at 10:20 AM, Irving wrote: > Jon, > > Just out of curiosity, how, if at all, does