What is currently working well on the list? What, if anything, could be
improved?
If we should promote it, it would help to have a paragraph with succinct
directions that all could use. I have been very impressed with the quality
of posts and the civility here.
What are our goals with this
Cathy, Stephen, List--In reflecting on Cathy's good questions and
Stephen's thoughtful 'first response', I thought immediately of Joe's
remarks which pretty much constitute the peirce-l forum page, some of
them seemingly directed precisely to Cathy's questions. See:
Peircers,
Yet another attack of synchronicity -- I just now happened to be working on the
markup of
some old work and I ran across this bit where I was trying to puzzle out a
sensible picture
of how the normative science fit together within a pragmatic perspective on
their objects.
|
Dear Peirce Listers,
Apropos of the recent messages regarding the Peirce
Society meeting at SAAP earlier this month in New York, yes, I was there too
and
heard Tom Short's responses after his paper (unsatisfactory, in my estimation;
but he told me that he hadn't slept the night before)
Dear Terry, Gary, Cathy, et al.,
Thanks for your comments. But I don't think you quite get my point,
namely; that the idealizing of the passions, including the idealization of
love, as a means of creative agents capable of transforming the world though
the active realization of
