[peirce-l] Benjamin Peirce on universal will.

in the Collected Papers but does not mention to which text he refers. Does anyone know? With respect, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering http://iase.info

[peirce-l] Manifolds of sense and interpretation

the 8th. With respect, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering http://iase.info - You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the PEIRCE-L

[peirce-l] The family of Benjamin Peirce

Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering http://iase.info - You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the PEIRCE-L listserv. To remove yourself from this list, send

Re: [peirce-l] The family of Benjamin Peirce

. It gives me a very different perspective of the time and the place. Regards, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering http://iase.info On Mar 20, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Kenneth Ketner wrote: Steven and group: I had the same

Re: [peirce-l] a question

of time is a product of the unifying effect of what Peirce calls thirdness. With respect, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering http://iase.info On Mar 14, 2012, at 8:56 AM, Diane Stephens wrote: In the book Semiotics I

Re: [peirce-l] Proemial: On The Origin Of Experience

into environments in which life would not otherwise appear is an important criteria. Thank you for the stimulating response. With respect, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering http://iase.info On Mar 5, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Phyllis

Re: [peirce-l] Proemial: On The Origin Of Experience

Dear Stephen, Dover Beach is a beautiful poem, I love it. I assume that you are referring to Peirce's Preface to The Principles of Philosophy in the Collected Papers, correct? With respect, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering

Re: [peirce-l] Proemial: On The Origin Of Experience

I will be happy to send you a digital copy of Volume 1 of Explaining Experience In Nature: The Foundations Of Logic and Apprehension that provides more details of my work. With respect, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering http

[peirce-l] Proemial: On The Origin Of Experience

proceed without it, will give philosophers something to talk about for generations. It amuses me, in any case. In the meantime we in science, and logic in particular, have work to do. -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering http

Re: [peirce-l] Conceptions Of Locality In Logic And Computation, A History

. With respect, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering http://iase.info On Feb 14, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Irving wrote: Steven, I only very quickly scanned the abstract that you linked to, and would ask: With mereology

[peirce-l] Conceptions Of Locality In Logic And Computation, A History

-- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering http://iase.info - You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the PEIRCE-L listserv. To remove yourself from

Re: [peirce-l] SLOW READ: THE RELEVANCE OF PEIRCEAN SEMIOTIC TO COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AUGMENTATION

rejected, scientific fantasy now prevails. Better data has been usurped by more elaborate fictional effects visualized in contemporary media, deceiving us into a broad acceptance of nonsense and a distortion of our existential conceptions. With respect, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith

Re: [peirce-l] “On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic”

the mainstream. -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering http://iase.info http://senses.info - You are receiving this message because you are subscribed

Re: [peirce-l] SLOW READ: On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic

missed. With respect, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering http://iase.info http://senses.info - You are receiving this message because you

Re: [peirce-l] SLOW READ: On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic

. With respect, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering http://iase.info http://senses.info - You are receiving this message because you are subscribed

Re: [peirce-l] SLOW READ: On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic

exactly is that difference? With respect, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering On Nov 24, 2011, at 6:20 PM, Määttänen Kirsti wrote: Gary F.,Jon, list, I'll continue now with slow reading Joe's paper. Along with dealing

Re: [peirce-l] On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic

On Nov 18, 2011, at 4:51 AM, Irving wrote: ... All of this having been said, the best answer I can give is that, the points, lines, and planes and tables, chairs, and beer mugs remark aside, Hilbert would give different axiomatizations for different parts of mathematics. That is to say,

Re: [peirce-l] “On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic”

* the distinction is misleading because to draw the distinction causes an undue separation of concerns. With respect, Steven On Nov 25, 2011, at 2:27 AM, Steven Ericsson-Zenith wrote: Dear Jon, It's important to note that in his opening statement JR is not making a general statement about

Re: [peirce-l] SLOW READ: On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic

Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering http://iase.info http://senses.info - You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the PEIRCE-L listserv. To remove

Re: [peirce-l] “On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic”

to continue with the next few paragraphs of the paper shortly. With respect, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering http://iase.info http://senses.info

Re: [peirce-l] On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic

Dear Irving, Thank you for the correction regarding the source of Hilbert's remarks. I believe I read it in Unger's translation of The Foundations of Geometry, perhaps in the foreword or annotations, but I still have to check this. I assume that Hilbert is making a remark that appeals to

Re: [peirce-l] FW: [peirce-l] SLOW READ: On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic

Dear Irving, I did not intend to draw the association between Peirce and Hilbert that concerns you. My use of Hilbert's well-known line, thought now to be a matter of some embarrassment after Goedel's result, is only a reflection of my own view and not that of Peirce. I acknowledge the context

Re: [peirce-l] FW: [peirce-l] SLOW READ: On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic

On Nov 6, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Gary Fuhrman wrote: Steven, thanks for getting our next slow read started – i have a couple of questions and a comment on your first post. In your comments on JR's opening, you say that “Semeiotic Theory is, for me, the first activity of scientific thinking.” I

Re: [peirce-l] community of inquiry

You may consider the whole passage, CP 5.265 in SOME CONSEQUENCES OF FOUR INCAPACITIES: THE SPIRIT OF CARTESIANISM. In particular: We individually cannot reasonably hope to attain the ultimate philosophy which we pursue; we can only seek it, therefore, for the community of philosophers. Hence,

Re: [peirce-l] Some Leading Ideas of Peirce's Semioic

Dear Nathan, I'm glad that you have given a historical context to this paper written in 1976 and have highlighted the role that Joe played in helping us understand the importance of Peirce's conception of Semeiotic Theory. On reviewing the conversation this past month I regret that a

[peirce-l] SLOW READ: On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic

, support and encouragement. I will begin the slow read in a little over one week from now. Since the term Experience plays a central role in my own theory, this paper seems a most appropriate choice for me to review. With respect, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute

Re: [peirce-l] Sciences as Communicational Communities -- Academic Capitalism

Sadly I agree with Jon's sense of despondency concerning the war on science. The problem, however, is the product of central planning. As a consequence we are Serfs (Hayek). Looking for a prescriptive solution that is other than the simple devolution of this centralized system will only make

Re: [peirce-l] Jerry Dozoretz

with him. My best wishes and condolences to Jerry's friends and family. Sincerely, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering http://senses.info On Aug 21, 2011, at 1:06 PM, Benjamin Udell wrote: List, Jerry Dozoretz passed

Re: [peirce-l] Slow Read: Teleology and the Autonomy of the Semiosis Process

death content to be in God's hands CP 6.519-21. Best, Ben - Original Message - From: Steven Ericsson-Zenith To: PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 12:31 PM Subject: Re: [peirce-l] Slow Read: Teleology and the Autonomy of the Semiosis Process I

Re: [peirce-l] Slow Read: Teleology and the Autonomy of the Semiosis Process

. This ethos trains us to resist the doxa! Since i am not at the zenith of peirce exegesis, everything i have written is fallible. Best Stefan Am 05.08.2011 00:20, schrieb Steven Ericsson-Zenith: There is a clear distinction between Peircean Falliblism, what Popper called Falsification, which

[peirce-l] Wittgenstein on meaning

upon the poetic wind and scars each of us in its passing. And I'm quite sure that Peirce would have none of it. With respect, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science Engineering http://senses.info

Re: [peirce-l] Slow Read: Teleology and the Autonomy of the Semiosis Process

that this generative power is the independent action of the sign and that is it this action that forms the basis of semeiosis. I do not think he would approve of the metaphysics introduced by the notion you suggest. With respect, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute

Re: [peirce-l] Slow Read: Is Peirce a Phenomenologist? - Concept of category?

I can live with this if you can provide a concise definition of the distinctions between each, i.e., point to the distinctions that each of these authors made for the term. By your approach a further break down by author is required in mathematica categories. I'm not saying the approach is