in the Collected Papers but does not mention to which text he refers.
Does anyone know?
With respect,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http://iase.info
the 8th.
With respect,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http://iase.info
-
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the PEIRCE-L
Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http://iase.info
-
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the PEIRCE-L
listserv. To remove yourself from this list, send
. It gives me a very different perspective of the time and the
place.
Regards,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http://iase.info
On Mar 20, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Kenneth Ketner wrote:
Steven and group: I had the same
of time is a product of the
unifying effect of what Peirce calls thirdness.
With respect,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http://iase.info
On Mar 14, 2012, at 8:56 AM, Diane Stephens wrote:
In the book Semiotics I
into
environments in which life would not otherwise appear is an important criteria.
Thank you for the stimulating response.
With respect,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http://iase.info
On Mar 5, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Phyllis
Dear Stephen,
Dover Beach is a beautiful poem, I love it.
I assume that you are referring to Peirce's Preface to The Principles of
Philosophy in the Collected Papers, correct?
With respect,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
I will be happy to send you a digital copy of Volume 1 of
Explaining Experience In Nature: The Foundations Of Logic and Apprehension
that provides more details of my work.
With respect,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http
proceed without it, will give philosophers something to talk
about for generations. It amuses me, in any case. In the meantime we in
science, and logic in particular, have work to do.
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http
.
With respect,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http://iase.info
On Feb 14, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Irving wrote:
Steven,
I only very quickly scanned the abstract that you linked to, and would
ask: With mereology
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http://iase.info
-
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the PEIRCE-L
listserv. To remove yourself from
rejected, scientific fantasy now
prevails. Better data has been usurped by more elaborate fictional effects
visualized in contemporary media, deceiving us into a broad acceptance of
nonsense and a distortion of our existential conceptions.
With respect,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
the mainstream.
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http://iase.info
http://senses.info
-
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed
missed.
With respect,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http://iase.info
http://senses.info
-
You are receiving this message because you
.
With respect,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http://iase.info
http://senses.info
-
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed
exactly is that difference?
With respect,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
On Nov 24, 2011, at 6:20 PM, Määttänen Kirsti wrote:
Gary F.,Jon, list,
I'll continue now with slow reading Joe's paper. Along with dealing
On Nov 18, 2011, at 4:51 AM, Irving wrote:
...
All of this having been said, the best answer I can give is that, the
points, lines, and planes and tables, chairs, and beer mugs remark
aside, Hilbert would give different axiomatizations for different parts
of mathematics. That is to say,
* the distinction is misleading because to draw the
distinction causes an undue separation of concerns.
With respect,
Steven
On Nov 25, 2011, at 2:27 AM, Steven Ericsson-Zenith wrote:
Dear Jon,
It's important to note that in his opening statement JR is not making a
general statement about
Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http://iase.info
http://senses.info
-
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the PEIRCE-L
listserv. To remove
to continue with the next few
paragraphs of the paper shortly.
With respect,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http://iase.info
http://senses.info
Dear Irving,
Thank you for the correction regarding the source of Hilbert's remarks. I
believe I read it in Unger's translation of The Foundations of Geometry,
perhaps in the foreword or annotations, but I still have to check this. I
assume that Hilbert is making a remark that appeals to
Dear Irving,
I did not intend to draw the association between Peirce and Hilbert that
concerns you. My use of Hilbert's well-known line, thought now to be a matter
of some embarrassment after Goedel's result, is only a reflection of my own
view and not that of Peirce. I acknowledge the context
On Nov 6, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Gary Fuhrman wrote:
Steven, thanks for getting our next slow read started – i have a couple of
questions and a comment on your first post.
In your comments on JR's opening, you say that “Semeiotic Theory is, for me,
the first activity of scientific thinking.” I
You may consider the whole passage, CP 5.265 in SOME CONSEQUENCES OF FOUR
INCAPACITIES: THE SPIRIT OF CARTESIANISM. In particular:
We individually cannot reasonably hope to attain the ultimate philosophy which
we pursue; we can only seek it, therefore, for the community of philosophers.
Hence,
Dear Nathan,
I'm glad that you have given a historical context to this paper written in 1976
and have highlighted the role that Joe played in helping us understand the
importance of Peirce's conception of Semeiotic Theory. On reviewing the
conversation this past month I regret that a
, support and encouragement.
I will begin the slow read in a little over one week from now. Since the term
Experience plays a central role in my own theory, this paper seems a most
appropriate choice for me to review.
With respect,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute
Sadly I agree with Jon's sense of despondency concerning the war on science.
The problem, however, is the product of central planning. As a consequence we
are Serfs (Hayek). Looking for a prescriptive solution that is other than the
simple devolution of this centralized system will only make
with him.
My best wishes and condolences to Jerry's friends and family.
Sincerely,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http://senses.info
On Aug 21, 2011, at 1:06 PM, Benjamin Udell wrote:
List,
Jerry Dozoretz passed
death content to be in God's
hands CP 6.519-21.
Best, Ben
- Original Message -
From: Steven Ericsson-Zenith
To: PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: [peirce-l] Slow Read: Teleology and the Autonomy of the
Semiosis Process
I
.
This ethos trains us to resist the doxa! Since i am not at the zenith of
peirce exegesis, everything i have written is fallible.
Best
Stefan
Am 05.08.2011 00:20, schrieb Steven Ericsson-Zenith:
There is a clear distinction between Peircean Falliblism, what Popper
called Falsification, which
upon the poetic wind and scars each of us in its passing.
And I'm quite sure that Peirce would have none of it.
With respect,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http://senses.info
that this generative power is the independent action
of the sign and that is it this action that forms the basis of semeiosis.
I do not think he would approve of the metaphysics introduced by the notion you
suggest.
With respect,
Steven
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute
I can live with this if you can provide a concise definition of the
distinctions between each, i.e., point to the distinctions that each of these
authors made for the term.
By your approach a further break down by author is required in mathematica
categories. I'm not saying the approach is
33 matches
Mail list logo