Peircers,
My exploratory, glacial, back-tracking style of thinking is more suited to
wikis than blogs,
so my blog posts, like Peircean signposts, tend to grow over time. At any
rate, here's the
updated postings on subjects related to the open access revolution, more
lately, of course,
the rea
our finger on the
> full meaning of Janus, who is a symbol.”
>
> ** **
>
> Gene Halton
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* C S Peirce discussion list [mailto:PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU] *On
> Behalf Of *Stephen C. Rose
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 04, 2012 1:24 PM
> *To:*
en C. Rose
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2012 1:24 PM
To: PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
Subject: Re: [peirce-l] Knowledge Workers of the World, Unite !
For what it may be worth, else ignore. I have just started Peter's book which
is now 30 years old which seems young to me as most of mine were publis
al social fashion toward dialog as kind of sport, like wrestling? or
3.. in an unforced intellectual social fashion with a second-order tendency to feed upon itself at a first-order level - intellectual fashion consciousness?
Well, those are my conjectures and I'm not sure that I'm sticki
f at a first-order level - intellectual fashion
consciousness?
Well, those are my conjectures and I'm not sure that I'm sticking to them.
Best, Ben
----- Original Message -
From: Jon Awbrey
To: PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 12:20 AM
Subject: Re: [peirce-l
Peircers,
Gary Fuhrman wrote:
GF: I would agree that Peirce's third method of fixing belief is the most
difficult to give a suitable name to,
but I think Peirce's own choice eventually fell on "fermentation of ideas",
based on this paragraph dated
c. 1906:
CSP: [[[ My paper of Novembe
raph above).
Gary F.
-Original Message-
From: C S Peirce discussion list [mailto:PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jon Awbrey
Sent: February-04-12 4:23 PM
To: PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
Subject: Re: [peirce-l] Knowledge Workers of the World, Unite !
Ben & All,
My own interest
Ben & All,
My own interest in this topic has more to do with the ways that
economic, social, and technological systems facilitate or inhibit
the dynamics of inquiry -- and only incidentally with publication
and publishers per se -- but one has to play the ball of concrete
application where it lie
ty nevertheless. It's interesting to pursue the
resemblances of the methods. I've tended in the past to think of the first
three methods as involving mis-embodied Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness,
respectively.
Best, Ben
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Awbrey"
T
Peircers,
I added the following comment on Gowers's Weblog —
The late Joseph Ransdell (1931–2010), who did more to keep C.S. Peirce's
thought alive on the Web than
anyone else I know, had a particular interest in the issues surrounding open
peerage and publication.
Synchronicity being what it
For what it may be worth, else ignore. I have just started Peter's book
which is now 30 years old which seems young to me as most of mine were
published before the 80's. I want to make what may be a cliched observation
or a simplistic one. It seems to me we would do well to frame (at least)
non-sci
Peircers,
A few reflections that I posted on Gowers's Weblog that may be pertinent here --
Re: What’s wrong with electronic journals?
At: http://gowers.wordpress.com/2012/01/29/whats-wrong-with-electronic-journals/
Having spent a good part of the 1990s writing about what the New Millennium woul
12 matches
Mail list logo
