Addendum: for those who might be wondering what the content of category
theory might be, please take a look at either of the relevant PowerPoint
shows on Arisbe, say, this one:
http://www.cspeirce.com/menu/library/aboutcsp/richmond/trikonicb.ppt
Because trikonic also represents an 'art' (an applied
Gary F, list,
Just a quick response to one point in your post. Re:
Phenomenology:
phaneroscopy (firstness)
|> category theory (thirdness)
iconoscopy (secondness)
You commented: GF: But for JR, at least in the paper we are
slow-reading, category theory is really all there is to Peircean
phen
I am dumb to say anything save that I agree with the thrust of this from a
simple apprehension of firstness as first and perhaps identical with a
number of terms that P
uses to describe a slippery vagueness, excitation, confusion.
Phenomenolology and logic (which I sense he makes prior to phenomen
My final post as emcee of JR's paper “Is Peirce a Phenomenologist?” deals with
the final (and, i think, the weightiest) section of this paper, from [22] on,
which deals with “Peirce's phenomenology proper.” There are some discrepancies
between Peirce's own remarks on “phenomenology” (and “phaner
