Joe and list,
Your impression of Peirce's character is probably right, but I still insist
on I what I was trying to say:
In 1905, in What Pragmatism Is, when Peirce distinguishes pragmaticism
from other species of prope-positivism, he writes (and this was published in
The Monist) the following:
Theresa and list:
You say:
What I do not agree is with your suggestion that Peirce decided
subsequently to accommodate himself to Royce's sensibility as much as
possible (why not the other way round? that Royce, particularly after
Peirce's Lectures of 1898 (the Cambridge Conferences), was
