[peirce-l] Re: NEW ELEMENTS: So what is it all about?

2006-02-02 Thread Jason Charnesky
At 02:37 AM 2/2/2006 Thursday, you wrote: Kirsti, Bernard On the matter of Icons, mere icons, pure icons, and so on,.. snip 31.1.2006 kello 20:13, Bernard Morand kirjoitti BM: To continue the discussion, we find pure icons in the following passage of New Elements and pure indices will

[peirce-l] Re: NEW ELEMENTS: So what is it all about?

2006-02-02 Thread Gary Richmond
PS I should add, since I noticed that I commented on the classification of the sciences in my off-list note to Bernard, that when I wrote that Peirce's classification of the sciences was a "very trichotomic and catenaic thing" that I would emphasize the former suggesting that while there are

[peirce-l] Re: Collier on Pragmatics

2006-02-02 Thread Clark Goble
On Feb 2, 2006, at 3:37 AM, Konrad Talmont-Kaminski wrote: Clark, Glad you liked the paper. Hope you and the others on the list don't mind if I point out that the paper was co-written by John and myself, which explains the link not being for John's page. More importantly, I'd be curious