[peirce-l] Re: Panopedia

2006-02-25 Thread Steven Ericsson Zenith
Dear Larry, Thank you for your response. The references that you give reveal transparency regarding your organization but that is not the transparency we are discussing. Wikipedia is also transparent in this sense. We have discussed here the transparency of authorship - especially with res

[peirce-l] Re: Panopedia

2006-02-25 Thread Gary Richmond
Larry, list, Your project appears to hold great promise and is already taking impressive shape imo. It is especially encouraging to see Larry Lessig on board. This list may recall my positive review of an address he gave at Cooper-Union in NYC a year or so ago on copyright issues. I recall pos

[peirce-l] Re: Panopedia

2006-02-25 Thread Larry Sanger
All, Forgive the intrusion. After Jaime Nubiola forwarded Steven Zenith's mail to me, I thought I would respond here on the list (rather than bother Jaime further personally). I have no interest in a long drawn-out discussion--I simply wished to correct a few factual errors in Steven's post. Fi

[peirce-l] Re: Panopedia

2006-02-25 Thread Steven Ericsson Zenith
FWIW. I know of the ManyOne project and have tried before to understand what they are trying to do. Digital Universe is designed to promote that project. However, it requires you to download the ManyOne application suite - a new browser - to subscribe PLUS they want to up sell Internet serv

[peirce-l] Re: Panopedia

2006-02-25 Thread Jaime Nubiola
Dear all, I forwarded to Larry Sanger, co-founder of Wikipedia, the thread of messages on Panopedia. I copy below his answer announcing the new project Digital Universe that may interest to some people in the list, Jaime >Thanks for forwarding these mails about Panopedia. I'm seeing increasin