Hi, Thomas,
Some of what you say is quite suggestive. I hope somebody here at peirce-l
understands it better than I do.
I'm hardly acquainted with the EGs. I had a notion that they're basically a
visual form of 1st-order logic. I had no idea that Peirce's "exploding-point"
cuts and his maths o
Steven,
You may already be familiar with them, but if not see also Peter
Skagestad's relevant papers at Arisbe, perhaps especially the first two
in connection with the present question.
PETER SKAGESTAD
"The Mind's Machines: the Turing Machine, the
Steven,
See Kenneth Laine Ketner with the assistance of Arthur F. Stewart, "The Early
History of Computer Design: Charles Sanders Peirce and Marquand's` Logical
Machines", The Princeton University Library Chronicle, Volume XLV, Spring 1984,
no. 3, 187-211. I believe Ken is also a member of thi
What concerns general transitivity:
Perhaps one might say: Otherness is an Icon of Thirdness.
I'd better stop this now.
Ciao, Ben.
Thomas.
---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com
If you want to have a proof, please have a look at CP 3.523:
"Professor Schroeder's Iconic Solution of x -< phi x".
[Had to transcribe the greek letter; thomas]
The first formula on page 332 is the formula for general transitivity,
which is a restrictive expansion of normal transitivity (well,
t
Can you imagine now why I claimed that the "Peicean Cut" is an asymmetric,
quasi-periodic tiling of the plane?
I hope I am wrong somehow.
Otherwise that would be a revolution in the most iconic sense of the word
Iconicity.
You see?! Do you know what Peirce left over of the Kantian list of
cat
On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 09:28:56 +0100, Benjamin Udell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Dear Thomas,
As regards the structure of the Peirce Continuum, perhaps you've seen
this, where Peirce says that all Cantor's alephs are multitudes and that
true continua are greater and are not multitudes. I wis
