[peirce-l] Re: Peircean elements

Ben, I have a question. What is the relation between cognition and recognition? It seems that3a and 3b respond to two different questions, namely, what isa correct logical description of the structure of cognition and how is thatstructure *validated* for any given peice of information. No wonder

[peirce-l] Re: Design and Semiotics Revisited (...new thread from Peircean elements topic)

Hi, Jim, I don't know which blog you visited! If the scrollbar doesn't show up, I've got a problem. Is your computer a Mac? This link shoud take you directly to the blog post with the quotes. http://peircematters.blogspot.com/2005/02/collateral-observation-quotes.html There, you should be

[peirce-l] Collateral observation (quotes)

Jim, I don't know what could be wrong. It works fine on my MS Internet Explorer Mozilla. Ah, the heck with it! Here they are. - Best, Ben Collateral observation (quotes) Update: Thomas L. Short points to “a long and important section of MS318, first published by Helmut Pape in Nous 1990

[peirce-l] Re: Peircean elements

Jim, list, Jim wrote: Ben,I have a question. What is the relation between cognition and recognition? It seems that 3a and 3b respond to two different questions, namely, what is a correct logical description of the structure of cognition and how is that structure *validated* for any given