[peirce-l] Re: If a valence of four had been known to Peirce, would he have constructed a logic of firstness, secondness, thirdness and fourthness?

2006-05-16 Thread Jim Piat
    Jean-Marc Orliaguet quoted Peirece:   "Thus, the relation between the four bonds of an unsymmetrical carbon atom consists of twenty-four triadic relations".     Dear Jean-Marc,     Earlier I characterized the Carbon Hydrogen bonds in Methane as dyadic and suggested Peirce would have done

[peirce-l] Re: If a valence of four had been known to Peirce, would he have constructed a logic of firstness, secondness, thirdness and fourthness?

2006-05-16 Thread Jean-Marc Orliaguet
Jerry LR Chandler wrote: Dear Jean-Marc: On May 14, 2006, at 1:08 AM, Peirce Discussion Forum digest wrote: Subject: Re: If a valence of four had been known to Peirce, would  he have constructed a logic of firstness, secondness, thirdness and fourthness? From: Jean-M

[peirce-l] algebraic logic and category theory

2006-05-16 Thread Irving Anellis
Not long ago we considered the question of [mathematical] category theory as it might relate to CSP's work and possible interest in logic. A new article has just come up on arXiv.org using category theory to discuss the problem of distributivity. The question of whether all lattices are distributi

[peirce-l] Re: If a valence of four had been known to Peirce, would he have constructed a logic of firstness, secondness, thirdness and fourthness?

2006-05-16 Thread Jim Piat
I think we are on slightly different wavelengths. I agree that Peirce's basic reasoning is constructive up to three. The potential for a triune God as an influence had occurred to me earlier. But, the basis of a triune God is reasonable clear from biblical narratives and can be (unjustly) si

[peirce-l] Re: peirce-l digest: May 11, 2006

2006-05-16 Thread Gary Richmond
Ben, List, Sorry, by the time I finished the email Inadvertently posted to the list, I'd forgotten I hadn't changed the address to yours. Well, since I'm here, 2 small errata: Correia "has NOT given permission for distribution" and  Karl-Erich Wolff "assures (not 'assumes') me that the mathe

[peirce-l] Re: peirce-l digest: May 11, 2006

2006-05-16 Thread Gary Richmond
[off-list] Hi Ben, Hey, what happened to your feedback on my paper? Anyhow, probably best since I made some significant changes yesterday. BUT, will you be available to edit and Springer-ize it in a week or so? Please let me know so that if you can't I can set up contingency plans. If you can