Gary, list,
Well, I can't remember any more just what conversation it might have been
that started that notion going in my mind till it turned into something
mythical. Any record is lost on my old ruined hard drive. I simply have to stop
relying on these vague recallings when I post to peir
Ben wrote:
qualisign = tone = potisign
sinsign = token = actisign
legisign = type = famisign
While these are often called alternate names of the same things,
Gary has said that they aren't just sets of synonyms but instead
reflect some differences of conception. I.e., for some purp
Wilfred, list,
(Note: if responding to this html, please remember to delete any unneeded
graphics and text.)
As far as I can tell, when a quality functions as a sign, then it functions
only iconically, the idea being that that's all that it semiotically
_can_ do _as_ a quality. A quality
Bernard, Gary, list,
How come I never notice these errors until a minute after I send
them?
THIS is the triangular arrangement with regard to the "all-ascending"
ordering of the 10 classes of signs.
A
~ ~ E
B ~ ~ ~ J
~ ~ F ~ ~ ~ H
C ~ ~ ~ I
~ ~ G
D
ALL-ASCENDING (1-2-3) ORDER
Google apparently changed the address for the Hist-Logic history of logic
group. Try typing
http://groups.google.com/group/Hist-Logic
in the address bar, and it should come up.
Irving H. Anellis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.peircepublishing.com
Gary Richmond a écrit :
Thanks you Ben and Bernard!
Gary
Benjamin Udell wrote:
Thank you,
Bernard! -Ben
Fig 1 and Fig. 2 seem to be identical except that the second one has
colors which indicate explicitly that there are rows and columns.
But the third fig
