http://www.univ-perp.fr/see/rch/lts/marty/lattices/syntax.rtf
in addition to
http://www.univ-perp.fr/see/rch/lts/marty/lattices/Lattice-CP.rtf
Robert Marty
http://robert.marty.perso.cegetel.net/
---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com
Here is an article that I scanned some time ago, it was written by Andre
de Tienne:
http://www.medic.chalmers.se/~jmo/semiotic/Peirce_s_semiotic_monism.pdf
the first page is missing, but I think than anyone interested in signs
and in triadic relations should read it.
to summarize: being a
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
Here is an article that I scanned some time ago, it was written by
Andre de Tienne:
http://www.medic.chalmers.se/~jmo/semiotic/Peirce_s_semiotic_monism.pdf
the first page is missing, but I think than anyone interested in signs
and in triadic relations should
Bernard Morand wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
Here is an article that I scanned some time ago, it was written by
Andre de Tienne:
http://www.medic.chalmers.se/~jmo/semiotic/Peirce_s_semiotic_monism.pdf
the first page is missing, but I think than anyone interested in
signs and in
I am appalled at the fact that one can confuse
these two aspects, it reveals a complete misunderstanding of Peirce's
categories.
You' are "appalled" at certain scholars' "complete misunderstanding ofÂ
Peirce's categories." That is to say, you have closed your mind to
anything but your own
Frances to Joe and others...
There is a tendency for me to equate immediate or immediacy with
all metaphysical quiddities and representamens that are not signs, as
well as with all categorical primaries and firstnesses or firsts and
qualities that exist to sense, but especially to align them with
Robert, list,
Robert's "The Syntax of a Class of Signs" (scroll down to see) is
interesting. Robert might helpfully clarify a few things.
1. Robert's conclusion is "We can define the syntax of a classe of signs
as the part of the lattice of the ten classes of signs situated below this
Dear List:
in respect for fund raising for the edition of CSP's papers, the Peirce Edition Project at Indianapolis
is always in search of funds, Nathan Houser and everybody else there are working a lot for the work on
the CSP's papers.
more info can be found at their website:
Claudio, List,Justa small bibliographic collaboration.Cheers,J. LuracClaudio Guerri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jorge, List,I think that (even if I don't know too much about the exact way in which Lacan "met" Peirce) there is no discussion anymore that Lacan is LACAN after he
