[peirce-l] Re: Entelechy

2006-05-11 Thread Bill Bailey
Joe, Thank you for the below post--which I've cut away all but it's identification. I don't find entelechy of particular interest, but I'm in awe of Peirce's conception of communication and mediation. It's ready to bottle and label. Bill Bailey For the benefit of those who don't have a copy

[peirce-l] Re: NEW ELEMENTS: So what is it all about?

2006-05-11 Thread Jim Piat
Dear Ben, Gary R, Jerry-- Also in Vol 5 of the chronological edition (page 306 and 307) Peirce speaks of chemical valency: BEGIN QUOTE A straight road between two places, if not regarded itself as a place, is not a third place but only the pairedness of the two palces it connects. But a fo

[peirce-l] Re: Entelechy

2006-05-11 Thread Jim Piat
Dear Folks-- I came across this definition of Entelechy among the words Peirce is reputed to have defined for the Century Dictionay in 1886 (page 404 of Writings of Charles S Peirce A Chronological Edition Volume 5 1884-1886) -- I was looking for a definition of form. BEGIN QUOTE ENTGEL

[peirce-l] Re: NEW ELEMENTS: So what is it all about?

2006-05-11 Thread Jim Piat
Dear Ben, You wrote: Yeah, I think that the idea is that Peirce was _already_ working on the questions of classifying the elements when Mendeleev published his.Periodic Table. Peirce might have already worked out some of the picture, so it could have been contemporaneous with his work on ph