[peirce-l] Re: motivating force for Peirce's synthesis

2006-05-13 Thread Jerry LR Chandler
Gary / List: Sorry that my posts are not better articulated. Time pressures are many. On May 11, 2006, at 1:06 AM, Peirce Discussion Forum digest wrote: Subject: Re: motivating force for Peirce's synthesis From: gnusystems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:06:23 -0400 Jerry,

[peirce-l] Re: peirce-l digest: May 11, 2006

2006-05-13 Thread Jerry LR Chandler
On May 12, 2006, at 1:05 AM, Peirce Discussion Forum digest wrote: Off-list, Gary Richmond, who's quite busy, sent me this: 66~~ Chemistry expresses itself in Peirce's valency theory (the term is not his but Ken Ketner's who hasn't been given enough credit yet for his work in

[peirce-l] If a valence of four had been known to Peirce, would he have constructed a logic of firstness, secondness, thirdness and fourthness?

2006-05-13 Thread Jerry LR Chandler
Jim: Thank you very very much for these quotes! They provide a partial answer to my open query. My chemical perspective from the early 21 Century follows. Dear Ben, Gary R, Jerry-- Also in Vol 5 of the chronological edition (page 306 and 307) Peirce speaks of chemical valency: BEGIN

[peirce-l] CfP First International Pragmatic Web Conference 2006 (PragWeb 2006)

2006-05-13 Thread Gary Richmond
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=010600060103030207070904 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --010600060103030207070904 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable